Wednesday, April 20, 2011
Day 10
Tuesday, April 19, 2011
Day 9
Monday, April 18, 2011
Day 8
Friday, April 15, 2011
Day 7
Thursday, April 14, 2011
Day 6
Is there a way the technology can help “offload” some of the material that students will learn? Perhaps a pre-activity diagram matching anatomy with labels can introduce students to information taught in a physical therapy lesson. Or can a follow-up self-check quiz reinforce key dates prior to a history of jazz discussion about the impact of technology on jazz?
Wednesday, April 13, 2011
Day 5
Yesterday, we noted that we look at technology applications for (1) how they can enhance student learning and/or (2) how they can help the instructor to manage his/her teaching tasks. A great tool that may help you to manage scheduling synchronous meetings (e.g., guest speakers, office hours, conferences) is Doodle. It is a polling system that gathers votes on when participants are available. Has anyone used Doodle? Another application you might find helpful for timing student presentations is an online timer. You gotta love the nice big numbers on this stopwatch.
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
DAY 4
Sunday, April 10, 2011
Over the past five years, Lorna and I have reviewed about 40 or 50 courses using the QM rubric. Not that long ago, most courses were text-based and students were using dial-up modems to access their learning material. Today, audio, video, games, simulations, and other forms of multimedia are freely available. Publishers offer a wide range of rich resources. The expectation of peer reviewers is that courses will incorporate some media beyond basic text. However, multimedia is not a requirement of Standard 6. Should it be?
Friday, April 8, 2011
Having fun yet? While you are digging into the Standard 6 course material in Moodle, here are some interesting statistics that provide additional information about course technology standards.
In 2008-2010, QM studied inter-rater reliability or the level of agreement among peer reviewers conducting course reviews. The following Standard 6 criteria had the highest levels of inter-rater reliability:
• 6.5 The course components are compatible with current standards for delivery modes. (94%)
• 6.1 The tools and media support the learning objectives, and are appropriately chosen to deliver the content of the course. (91%)
• 6.4 Students have ready access to the technologies required in the course. (91%)
On the other end of the spectrum, the standard with one of the lowest levels of inter-rater reliability is:
• 6.7 The course design takes full advantage of available tools and media. (70%)
The low level of inter-rater reliability indicates that peer reviewers have a broad range of interpretations for Standard 6.7. Your thoughts?
Tuesday, April 5, 2011
Standard 6: Choose and Use Media Effectively
DAY 1
Let the games begin! In addition to the Standard 6 Moodle material, we will supplement the course with a blog (our personal comments shared through this website). The purpose of our blog is to share additional timely information about instructional
Wikis and blogs are among the most useful tools we have used in online courses. A blog is similar to a journal or commentary with one person (in our case – two writers) posting information for a targeted group. You can read and comment on our blog entries, but you cannot change them. Many students on study abroad programs have blogs about their travel and learning experiences. A wiki is a collaborative webpage. A group of students can use it to develop a lab report or plan a presentation. Unlike a blog, participants in a wiki all have the ability to write and edit the information.
We hope you will follow our blog entries over the 10 days of this course.